Grading for Growth

Share this post

Repost: Rigor

gradingforgrowth.com

Discover more from Grading for Growth

Research and ideas about reforming grading practices in higher education and beyond.
Over 3,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

Repost: Rigor

A look back at one of our earliest posts, on a critical topic

David Clark
Aug 28, 2023
1
Share this post

Repost: Rigor

gradingforgrowth.com
3
Share
Photo by Kerin Gedge on Unsplash

The Grading for Growth blog just passed its 2nd anniversary! Our first post was in July of 2021. We’ve grown from no readers at all back then, to over 3000 subscribers now reading our weekly posts.

That means that the vast majority of our readers have probably never seen our first few posts. So today, I’d like to highlight an early post from September 2021, back when our blog had about 10% of its current readers.

This post is about a word that infuses academia: Rigor. It was inspired by a particularly infuriating article that I’d just read, but also by conversations that constantly happen around grading and assessment. You can read it here:

Rigor

David Clark and Robert Talbert
·
September 13, 2021
Rigor

If you’re involved in academia in any way, you’ve heard the term rigor. It’s a constant companion in any discussion of grades, assessments, teaching methods, curriculum and course design. Let’s flip this intro, though: Before you read any farther, what does the word “rigor” mean to

Read full story

We’ll pick up again with new posts soon. Until then, enjoy reading about what rigor is, what it isn’t, and why I (still) think it has no place in our discussions of teaching.

Thanks for reading Grading for Growth! Subscribe for free to receive new posts every Monday.

1
Share this post

Repost: Rigor

gradingforgrowth.com
3
Share
Previous
Next
3 Comments
Share this discussion

Repost: Rigor

gradingforgrowth.com
Nicole Needleman
Aug 28Liked by Robert Talbert, David Clark

Thank you for expressing so eloquently something I've been thinking/arguing for years. I'm a high school math teacher and I struggle with our traditional grading system every year. Lately I have been trying to express to my colleagues my gripe with grading in this one-and-done approach and how unfair it is to students who simply need more time to deepen their understanding of functions or proofs or (insert any major math concept here). It always feels so unjust and definitive. I also feel like a complete hypocrite when I tell my students that 'Grades do not define you', and then turn around and do exactly that.

This school year I'm taking a step in the right direction by implementing rich feedback, reflection, revision and retake in my classes. I anticipate some pushback from many teachers, parents, even students who are more used to traditional grading. But someone needs to start making waves. So why not let it be me?

Wish me luck!

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
2 replies by Robert Talbert and others
2 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Robert Talbert
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing