Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Still lighting learning fires's avatar

I enjoyed the post and the story of your journey. The marathon that we are on -- to help improve learning for each individual learner -- is indeed a long one. For me, the biggest change was when I began to look at student learning in terms of "Proficiency" rather than their "Performances". This eliminates all the "retesting" and the late term negotiations and scrambling for those extra points to put them over some sort of imaginary line. It's the wonder of exchanging a "deficit" approach to grading and moving to an asset-based approach.

Derek Bruff's avatar

Hi Kate! Thanks for sharing your journey, both in running and in grading! I am sadly not running as much as I used to, but I'm determined to get back to it.

I recently read your 2015 "beginner's guide" post (this one: https://blogs.ams.org/matheducation/2015/11/20/a-beginners-guide-to-standards-based-grading/) and was struck by two pieces of your SBG scheme that I think are non-standard: (1) a student's "score" on a standard is the average of their last two attempts at that standard and (2) a portion of their final "score" comes from their performance on the final exam, regardless of their "score" going into the final. Are you still practicing both of those elements? And do you generally recommend those practices--or are they more tailored to your teaching context at CofC?

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?